[Asrg] Final(?) draft of DNSwL draft

[Barry Shein]

Far be it for me to flog a dead horse but aren't you two speaking past
each other? Unreliable isn't the same as insecure.

That said, I don't think one generally needs to repeat something like
that in a context like this; it should be tacit.

On July 29, 2007 at 02:04 asrg at johnlevine.com (John Levine) wrote:
 > >The use of DNSWLs to override any DNSBLs (or other criteria, also in
 > >a scoring mechanism) is only as reliable as the underlying transport
 > >mechanism (ie unreliable for DNS-over-UDP, especially over non-local
 > >links).
 > 
 > It already says that they're subject to the usual DNS attacks.  I don't
 > see the point of adding this disclaimer.
 > 
 > R's,
 > John
 > 
 > _______________________________________________
 > Asrg mailing list
 > Asrg at ietf.org
 > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

-- 
        -Barry Shein

The World              | bzs at TheWorld.com           | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 800-THE-WRLD        | Login: Nationwide
Software Tool & Die    | Public Access Internet     | SINCE 1989     *oo*