[Asrg] Round one modifications to DNSBL BCP draft.

[Andrew D Kirch]

Al Iverson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Chris Lewis <clewis at nortel.com> wrote:
>
>   
>>  > Determining the network provider helps establish their reputation,
>>  > which should represent a significant factor in whether their
>>  > advertised space can be trusted.
>>
>>  Very few existing (at least public) DNSBLs pay any attention whatsoever
>>  to this.  Those that do usually do little more than ad-hoc aggregate
>>  statistical reports, eg http://cbl.abuseat.org/country.html and
>>  http://cbl.abuseat.org/domain.html, or Spamhaus's country/provider top
>>  100 listings, or Cymru's or helping guide the manual escalation of
>>  manual listings...
>>     
>
> MAPS seems to be the only one pushing for inclusion of this
> requirement. Unless there's strong evidence that other BLs find it to
> be a best practice, I say we call the discussion closed on this point
> and move on.
>
> It's not only too "type of BL" specific, it seems to be specific only
> to a single BL.
>
> Regards,
> Al Iverson
>
>
>   
I concur, we simply don't use this or see a need to.

Andrew