[Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP
Matt Sergeant
msergeant at messagelabs.com
Tue Apr 1 12:14:41 PDT 2008
On 1-Apr-08, at 1:07 PM, Chris Lewis wrote:
> 2.1. Transparency
>
> A DNSBL SHOULD carefully describe the criteria which are the cause
> for adding, and the criteria for removing an IP address or domain
> name on the list.
Here we talk about IP addresses or domain names. I think we should
stick with "Listing" or "Entry".
And did you add something somewhere about how a Listing/Entry might
map to >1 "thing" in the list? e.g. a range/ASN/whatever?
> 2.2.1. Listings SHOULD Be Temporary
Much improved.
> 2.2.3. Removals SHOULD Be Prompt
Also much improved.
> 3.3. DNSBLs SHOULD Provide Operational Flags
>
> Most DNSBLs follow a convention of entries for IPs in
> 127.0.0.0/8 to
> provide online indication of whether the DNSBL is operational. In
> other words, the result of a DNS lookup will be in the range of
> 127.0.0.1 through 127.0.0.255.
I don't think this "in other words" fits. The first talks about
operational entries, the second talks of results. And the first talks
of a /8 and the latter the /24.
> Many DNSBLs arrange to have a query
> of 127.0.0.2 return an A record indicating that the IP is
> listed, and
> a query of 127.0.0.1 return no A record (NXDOMAIN). When both of
> these indicators are present, this indicates that the DNSBL is
> functioning normally. See [DNSBL-EMAIL].
>
> Other results, such as 127.0.0.3, may have different meanings.
> This
> operational flag usage and meaning SHOULD be published on the
> DNSBL's
>
>
>
> Lewis & Sergeant Expires September 2, 2008
> [Page 10]
> Internet-Draft DNSBL BCP March
> 2008
>
>
> web site.
>
> Some mail systems are unable to differentiate between these various
> results or flags, however, so a public DNSBL MUST NOT include
> opposing or widely different meanings -- such as 127.0.0.23 for
> "sends good mail" and 127.0.0.99 for "sends bad mail" -- within the
> same DNS zone.
Not sure why this is a MUST NOT. If people are dumb enough to use a
mixed list in a broken way they get what they deserve. What's the
justification?
Matt.
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
More information about the Asrg
mailing list