[Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"

[Frank Ellermann]

Andrew D Kirch wrote:

> Our presence is needed here to make this draft a success,
> whereas yours is not.  Al Iverson and I both requested
> that you stop this behavior after your first post, and
> you have not.

You have an odd style to discuss an off list mail, but you
quoted it completely, whatever you read in it is visible. 

> You opine that DNSBL's are harmful

Nonsense.  I gave you a link to a draft stating that, off
list, and "crap" isn't the word I'd use when I support it.

> you then proceed with ad hominem attacks against a DNSBL
> operator

Certainly not today and not here, and FWIW also not in the
last year on any list.  
 
> If you disagree with my stance here, please contact me
> privately to discuss the matter

When you anyway answer on list that's pointless.  Whatever
you are up to, it's not related to discussing one or both
of the proposed drafts.  In case you didn't know this, at
some point in time they need some form of consensus, and
starting flamewars won't help.

 Frank