[Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"

[Chris Lewis]

J D Falk wrote:
> Steve Atkins wrote:
> 
>> The interesting case is where a list is being used to publish
>> something like metrics or datapoints about mail delivery (e.g. ISIPP)
>> and it's not purely a blacklist or whitelist, just something
>> email-related delivered by DNS. 
> 
> Yep, there are a few such things now -- but not enough (and not in wide
> enough usage) for a BCP yet.
> 
>> That seems even further out of scope
>> for a BCP on binary blacklists, though.
> 
> +1

If I'm forced into a glossary of DNSBL types (DNSBL, DNSWL, RHSBL, URIBL 
etc), other DNS lookupy things (like routeviews, ISIPP etc) should be 
mentioned in passing, if only to rule them out of scope.

A one page appendix maybe.