[Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP

[Larry M. Smith]

Chris Lewis wrote:
(snip)
> Is there a testing convention for RHSBLs currently in use?  RHSBLs 
> _could_ still use the 127.0.0.2 convention just like DNSBLs do, there's 
> really nothing preventing it.  Other than deciding whether the octets 
> should be reversed or not.

I believe it may be somewhat common to list example.com in this case... 
  And in keeping with a DNSBL should not list 127.0.0.1, and RHSBL 
should not list "localhost.localdomain"

Example;
$ dig +short example.com.rhsbl.sorbs.net
127.0.0.11
$ dig +short localhost.localdomain.rhsbl.sorbs.net
$