[Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"

[J D Falk]

Chris Lewis thought:

> der Mouse wrote:
 [ . . . ]
>> Might I suggest DNSL, then, instead of DNSBL?
>  That, is one of the thoughts I had.

This is a Best Current Practices document, and thus we've already been
through arguments about intorducing new practices that aren't currently
in widespread use.  Shouldn't we similarly avoid introducing new /words/
that aren't currently in widespread use?