[Asrg] Not an IPv6 BCP?!

[Tony Hansen]

::2 is reserved for IETF use. This seems like it could be a perfectly 
valid such use to be defined for it.

	Tony Hansen
	tony at att.com

Frank Ellermann wrote:
> 
> It's not really "controversial", it would be only nice to
> hear from some IPv6 experts that ::2 is okay as sacrifice.
> 
> I.e. that nobody would ever want to list or not list that
> IP for "real".  Outside of a toy DNSBL with say "odd IPs",
> where ::2 or 127.0.0.2 don't qualify as "odd enough".