[Asrg] Not an IPv6 BCP?!

[John Levine]

> Ah, okay, whew.  But even so, wouldn't it make more sense to do some
> research into IPv6 DNSBLs before defining how they'll work?  Or if
> not, wouldn't it make more sense to get the current spec published
> before adding something uncertain & controversial?

For the most part, the way that v6 DNSBLs will work is obvious, just
use the v6 rDNS naming rather than v4 rDNS naming.  The only parts
that aren't obvious are arbitrary, notably the test addresses.  Since
they're arbitrary, it makes sense to me to define them now so that
when people start building v6 DNSBLs they interoperate.

R's,
John