[Asrg] Re: ASRG session at IETF 71

[Frank Ellermann]

John L wrote:

> Due to the rather notable lack of ASRG activity during the past year,
> I suspect this will be the session where we decide to pack it in.

Not without an RFC number for your DNSBL draft ;-)  What's the state
of the art with this memo ?  Looking for an A-D, needs a write up, or
still waits for "IRTF RFC publishing rules" ?  I'm not aware of any
pending effort to create new rules for the IRTF, besides I don't care
about it as long as your DNSBL draft *somehow* gets an RFC number.

 Frank
-- 
http://purl.net/xyzzy/rxwhois.htm#usage