[Asrg] Another dnsbl draft, now standards flavored

[Frank Ellermann]

John Levine wrote:

> The IESG has expressed interest in my dnsbl draft turning
> into a standards track RFC rather than informational.

Good...

> Take a look, tell us if I got anything seriously wrong.

...skipping typos and editorial nits reported separately ::2
is interesting, as I didn't know it.  My intuitive idea for
an IPv6 test address would have been ::FFFF:127.0.0.2 based
on the IPv4 test address.  Never listing ::1 is clear, same
idea as for 127.0.0.1.  WTH is ::FFFF:127.0.0.2 in a DNSBL ?

0.0.0.2.0.0.F.7.F.F.F.F.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0 
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2

Well, nobody said that IPv6 DNSBLs are pretty.
 
> http://www.taugh.com/dnsbl

A diff to -05 is still readable, <http://tinyurl.com/6budf7>

 Frank