[Asrg] Another dnsbl draft, now standards flavored

[Frank Ellermann]

John Levine wrote:

> The IPv6 test entries really need to be IPv6 addresses or
> you're demanding special code in the server for the test
> addresses.
 
> I picked ::2 as the test address because it was next to
> ::1, just like 127.0.0.2 is next to 127.0.0.1.

Ugh, I just send a separate mail.  Yes, it's clear why you
picked ::2.  Now IFF ::FFFF:a.b.c.d *MUST* be treated as 
IPv4 a.b.c.d by lists *and* clients, then ::FFFF:127.0.0.2
is the same as 127.0.0.2. 

You don't have that *MUST* yet, but it might make sense...

 Frank