[Asrg] Another dnsbl draft, now standards flavored

[SM]

At 07:57 AM 7/29/2008, John Levine wrote:
>I don't have strong opinions about what the test entry should be,
>but it seems a poor idea to make it an address that might actually
>appear on a network.  Where's fc00:: defined?  I don't see it in
>RFC 4291.

See RFC 4193.

Regards,
-sm