[Asrg] draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists draft updated.

[Al Iverson]

On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Chris Lewis <clewis at nortel.com> wrote:


>> which would be solved by clearly sectioning into BCP for providing and
>> BCP for use, no guessing would be req'd after that
>
> I'd prefer not to do any major surgery on the document at this point.
> It's been _way_ too long already (though that's probably not a very good
> reason ;-).
>
> It would cause some significant flow/replication/redundancy uglies.  But
> I do see the point about interspersing them.
>
> I'm considering a brief summarization section of the "SHOULD/MUST/MAY"
> split between user and provider.   Thoughts?

This seems sound and wise.

Best,
Al

-- 
Al Iverson on Spam and Deliverability, see http://www.spamresource.com
News, stats, info, and commentary on blacklists: http://www.dnsbl.com
My personal website: http://www.aliverson.com -- Chicago, IL, USA
Remove "lists" from my email address to reach me faster and directly.