[Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage

[mathew]

On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 13:20, Rich Kulawiec <rsk at gsp.org> wrote:

> It's irrelevant because it doesn't matter which of the two scenarios
> above prevails; all of these schemes are pre-failed because they
> all presume that something is true which is emphatically false: network
> endpoints are secure.  All of these proposals thus amount to attempts
> to layer a trust mechanism on top of an already-known badly-broken base.


I think you're on the wrong mailing list. You should be on the "how do we
un-pwn a few million Windows PCs" list, if you think that that's an
essential prerequisite to doing anything technical about spam.


mathew
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.irtf.org/pipermail/asrg/attachments/20081129/1e66f6b8/attachment.htm>