[rrg] Fundamental objections toahost-basedscalableroutingsolution

Christopher Morrow morrowc.lists at gmail.com
Tue Dec 2 01:07:15 PST 2008


argh!!! wrong src, sorry.

On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 2:48 PM, Christopher Morrow
<morrowc.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Templin, Fred L
> <Fred.L.Templin at boeing.com> wrote:
>>>|> That implies that the
>>>|> ETR does a mapping lookup on the receipt of a packet, buffers
>>>|> the packet until the lookup succeeds, and the does the
>>>|> compare.
>>>|
>>>|Oh you mean like the IPv6 neighbor discovery process!?
>>>
>>>
>>>Two wrongs don't make a right.
>>
>> Why buffer the packet until the lookup succeeds? Why not
>> just accept the first few packets while a lookup is done
>
> a synflood is a bunch of 1 packet flows :( you lose, I win! yippee! :(
> Seriously though, if you send through 'some' of the bad packets all
> the attacker has to know is how many 'some' is... in the worst case
> the answer is 'one'.
>
> Buffering is bad, really, really bad.
>
> -chris
>


More information about the rrg mailing list