[rrg] Agenda request: Presentation on new host stack architecture
HeinerHummel at aol.com
HeinerHummel at aol.com
Tue Nov 11 11:16:59 PST 2008
In einer eMail vom 11.11.2008 09:51:36 Westeuropäische Normalzeit schreibt
christian.vogt at ericsson.com:
On Nov 11, 2008, HeinerHummel at aol.com wrote:
> Imagine the following: IP packets are forwarded down to the (egress)
> router (to which the destination user is somehow attached) without
> looking at the destination IP address ! This also means: the
> destination information may be what so ever: an IPv4 address, an
> IPv6 address, or even a USER NAME !! Wouldn't this fit to your
> proposal perfectly?
Heiner,
are you thinking of forwarding packets based on the destination
hostname while the packet is within an edge network? That could, of
course, be an extension to the proposal I am making.
Yes. My saying since 45 is of course that there is no reason to route based
on worldwide user reachability information dissemination, i.e. that this
scalability problem can be eliminated completely. Provided: Each DFZ router has
a consistent view of a well-sparsed internet topology, while knowing the
geo-locations of all viewed nodes, and the geolocation related to the IP packets'
destination which should be the geolocation of that router toward which
forwarding shall/could be done without looking at the destination IP address.
That router is - normally - a router of the service provider at the service
provider's site. Behind that point routing could either be done traditionally,
i.e. based on the destination IPv4 resp. IPv6 address or based on something
else like: e.g. host name or E.164 without DNS mapping, or... or...or...
And of course also based on geolocation information of an intra-domain edge
network.
The proposal
right now, however, uses IP addresses for routing; the hostnames are
included only in the first packets of a connection in order to sync
the two peers.
I know.
Heiner
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.irtf.org/pipermail/rrg/attachments/20081111/075a9166/attachment.htm>
More information about the rrg
mailing list