[rrg] Summary of architectural solution space

[Brian E Carpenter]

On 2008-11-25 10:02, Tony Li wrote:
>  
> 
> |Indeed. Actually it escaped via RFC 1881 (December 1995), and it was
> |intentional. I personally believe that the registries have made it
> |too easy to get PI prefixes, but that was a choice of the operational
> |community. However, it doesn't change what I was trying to say,
> |which is that the *design* assumption for IPv6 was PA, so it seems
> |appropriate to call that Plan A.
> 
> 
> Interesting.  So you're saying that it's perfectly ok for the operational
> folks to set aside the stated routing architecture and do something else?

Not exactly, but I think we do have to try to make future technology
intersect with reality.

   Brian