[rrg] NANOG44 session on current IP address challenges

Dino Farinacci dino at cisco.com
Tue Oct 21 10:44:19 PDT 2008


> Map-n-encap would upset Jon, as written GSE depends heavily on DNS,  
> GSE
> conversion would take longer to solve routing scaling than we have  
> time
> for, and nobody wants to make NAT the centerpiece of the new  
> architecture.

Scott, do you think Jon would be upset with LISP, as the way it is  
currently defined?

Dino



More information about the rrg mailing list