[rrg] [lisp] Please respond: Questions from the IESG as to whether a WG forming BOF is necessary for LISP
Dino Farinacci
dino at cisco.com
Mon Feb 2 10:02:58 PST 2009
I said *could*. Don't take this for a design. There are lots of
details lacking.
Dino
On Feb 1, 2009, at 6:48 PM, Xu Xiaohu wrote:
>>
>>> I don't think those are the only two alternatives. For example,
>>> something like the APT idea where the full mappings are
>> shipped to a
>>> set of devices such that such a full set is near to and on
>> the query
>>> path of any leaf is an alternative worth examining.
>>
>> We have stated before that LISP-ALT routers could cache
>> mappings. This can help with Map-Request latency. And if the
>> mappings are cached do to seeing Map-Replies or because they
>> are pushed with some other protocol, then so be it.
>
> Does that mean the mapping system ( ALT overlay ) would spread some
> outdated
> mapping informations to the ITRs? Besides, will it make the ALT router
> become another vulnerable place?
>
> Xiaohu
>
More information about the rrg
mailing list