[rrg] Remote ACLs [Proposals which match rrg architectures.html pls check the page]
Dino Farinacci
dino at cisco.com
Sun Jan 4 13:58:37 PST 2009
The simple/short answer is because they are being used as IDs.
Dino
On Jan 4, 2009, at 12:20 PM, Noel Chiappa wrote:
>> From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com>
>
>> Isn't this in fact a (perceived) problem with the multi-prefix model?
>> If an endpoint has multiple locators, then any site that puts one of
>> those locators in an ACL needs to put all of them in the ACL.
>
> Why are people putting locators in ACLs anyway?
>
> (Note: This is not the same thing as the question 'why is the hardware
> looking at locators to implement ACLs?'. Looking at locators might
> be a fine
> engineering choice for the _implementation_ of ACLs.)
>
> Noel
> _______________________________________________
> rrg mailing list
> rrg at irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
More information about the rrg
mailing list