[rrg] Remote ACLs [Proposals which match rrg architectures.htmlpls check the page]

Dino Farinacci dino at cisco.com
Sun Jan 4 17:19:07 PST 2009


If EID-prefixes are allocated from RIRs, we can have structure. That  
is what the LISP architecture defines. Since it's a different  
namespace from the RLOC namespace, it's aggregation boundaries (in the  
address itself) can be different.

Dino

On Jan 4, 2009, at 5:10 PM, Xu Xiaohu wrote:

>
>>
>> |The simple/short answer is because they are being used as IDs.
>>
>>
>> And this is an architectural bug that we should endeavour to
>> fix, not propagate.
>
> If we want to use ID in the ACL, should it also have some structure in
> semantics? since the flat ID will cause a scaling issue with ACL and  
> a huge
> burden for manually configuration.
>
> Xiaohu
>
>



More information about the rrg mailing list